
Remote Viewing

Introduction: Can RV – remote viewing determine the future accurately? Humanity has always wanted to read into the unseeable future. Fortune tellers, psychics and those who use witchcraft, have all attempted to predict future events. But can they do it consistently? Is there a resource that can pinpoint precisely the future? Yes. The answer remains in the prophetic Word of God.
1. Jesus Christ, being God in the flesh, foretold His disciples events that would transpire in the future. Some have been fulfilled. Others are yet to be fulfilled. For example, in Matthew 24, Jesus saw into the prophetic future and revealed that Herod’s temple would be destroyed.
“And Jesus went out, and departed from the temple: and his disciples came to him for to shew him the buildings of the temple. 2And Jesus said unto them, See ye not all these things? verily I say unto you, There shall not be left here one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down.” (Matt 24:1,2)
Historically, this happened around 70 A.D., approximately 40 years after the prediction.
2. In the context of future events; namely false Christ’s, pestilences, earthquakes, wars and rumors of wars, and the abomination of desolation, Jesus poured into His disciples concerning prophecy – or future events.
In fact, our Lord said this:
“But take ye heed: behold, I have foretold you all things.” (Mark 13:23)
Since Jesus knows the past, present and future, do you think we ought to read His Word more?
Conclusion: According to historians, former Presidents recommended the CIA join forces with Remote Viewing to uncover covert military operations against the U.S. This is not a new practice. Instead, for centuries, people have sought to tap into physical and spiritual realities. However, Daniel the prophet discovered the personal insight of future events through the power of prayer and from the revelation of Jesus Christ. We had better stick with God’s way of revealing the future lest we be deceived by demonic forces.
“RV is an experiential technique for altered-anomalous states (see Utts, 1995, 1996, 2018) that allows two types of anomalous cognitions to be subjected to empirical scrutiny (see also Schooler et al., 2018): (a) precognition (also called anticipation of unpredictable stimuli or anomalous anticipation of information, Mossbridge et al., 2012) can be defined as the process by which a person accesses information about the future (i.e., events that have not yet happened) without using sensory or otherwise rational channels recognized by conventional scientific theory (Bem, 2011); and (b) retro-cognition (also called anomalous information reception or clairvoyance) is defined as the process by which a person accesses content referring to the past (i.e., content that has already happened) without using the conventional channels of biology or logic per current scientific theory (Marwaha & May, 2016).”